Categories
Saturday

TV: The Next Generation

Saturday, March 10th @ 3:30 pm

Tom Merritt   Editor,   CNET.com
Jay Adelson   CEO,   Revision3 Corporation
Nicole Carrico   Dir Creative Dev,   AOL
Patrick Norton   Exec Producer,   Ziff Davis Media
Greg Brannan   VP of Programming,   CNET 

How can web video compete w/Hollywood?
Indy video
Can’t really tell where TV is going, really have to chase what producing for – big TV system or netvideo computer. They haven’t really come together in a meaningful way yet.

Hollywood flocks to whatever they’re going to make the most money on – starting to shift now that ads are coming to web video. Still slow, but starting to trickle in.

Figure out who the audience is and target to that audience w/web content – tech video for geeks has been a good starting position because it’s the geeks who are starting to do this.

AOL is trying to get into the niche – audience is not a problem for them. how do we get that video out to that audience is what AOL can do w/partnerships. Going out to find stars out there and get partnerships started.

How to get into it?
Do what you want and get popular as a semi-professional, wish that doing the 2nd thing was your real job. Rev3 finds that content and brings it in to make that primary job possible (kevin rose)

Low-cost producers can partner but it’s tough when there are things (mortgage and kids) getting in the way – risky.

Will big brands take over the space?
Youtube can get you noticed, Viacomm is already known so removing their vidoes from youtube isn’t a big deal. Youtube is more important in this sense for the unknowns. If it doesn’t work out for Viacomm on their own, they’ll be back to Youtube.

Ultimately the viewer has the choice. Rev3 doesn’t care about the platform – now traditional tv are coming to do deals for content.

Best way to get it out (youtube/podcast/own site). If content resonates the viewers are willingn to come back – if your stuff is good – will come back to see what you are doing. Content producers will HAVE to let go of thir death grip on their content.

Medium informs and connects people – all competing for eyeballs how to make money at this?
It used to be a proven formula would determine if something made it on. If it fit the form, it made it to TV.
Now there is proof (not just nielson ratings) that viewers are there – advirtisers will finally pay for it (tech content)

Can web video meet TV’s #’s?
Cable audiences also have low #’s hwo do you monetize this content and #’s? podtrack, federated media.
Smaller content need to start w/federated media or wait and see who comes to you – can’t get the big names because they don’t go for this model

Direct marketing model – code enter for website. “will share 5%” adazio tea (digg) major $$

AOL looks at more meaningful big name ads – on-air component needed – franchises such as AmEx gateway for ads or gateway to content

Online advirtisers are used to click through or banner ads – TV ads are used w/Nielson
Ad agencies just starting to do on-air ads (50’s Ed Sullivan style) and are beginning to notice

Honesty is important here – even bad commentary is fine i.e. Zune on Diggnation – best ad they could have paid for, alex’s rand. All about trust w/the host or program

TV will converge w/video at some point
The volume of this very specialized material is huge because it is so specialized – just need to find ads to that specific area.

Major networks will be drawn in at some point when the money is there.
Major nets are chasing weird things sometimes though – cell phone video (nobody uses)

What do the big networks have to do to get into this space?
These little ppl know these things
agility is an issue – big co’s can move as quickly
feedback response is tough for large, they can’t respond quickly enough to make a better product

At some point the big networks will begin to aquire these little ones – What will they do w/it? Do smalls want that? Does it make sense for a smaller co to go w/the big co’s?

The gatekeepers will buy up the smaller co’s, but there will always be other’s to take their place.

Content discovery does become an issue (0r IS an issue). Too much good media
Companies are trying to be a guide to all these – Digg model “my peer group knows best vs. a large co”

Set top box needed to complete the puzzle and bring web/TV video together – Wii PS3 Xbox, those platforms will be looking for exclusive deals w/content. Things are moving to that direction.

Questions
Has content been compromised by ads?
No, because of choices might create a product w/sponsors in mind. and MUST be honest about it. That trust must be there.

Will some of these specials shows start to take over the lowest “filler” shows on the big networks? Lowest in of cable net fall out and partner up. Possible – again, big nets will go to money.

What happens when the little guys have to deal w/SAG and Directors Guild etc that the big guys have to deal w/now?
Some are dealing w/it now but there are plenty of people that don’t have those connections or don’t need that. distributers vs. producers mindset
the guilds won’t hurt you from doing your biz

How do you make TV interactive?
Many ways to step away from standard TV. clickable video – DVR’s are coming w/this soon

DVR’s break standard TV now when looking at scheduling etc. At what point do these things come together? You pick what you want to watch and when you want to watch it? It doesn’t matter when it is on or what channel it is on.
Joost

Categories
Saturday

Tag, You’re It

Saturday, March 10th @ 2:00 pm

Moderator: Heath Row Research Mgr, DoubleClick
Heath Row   Research Mgr,   DoubleClick
Ben Brown   Founder,   Consumating.com
George Oates   Producer,   Ludicorp
Thomas Vander Wal  InfoCloud Solutions Inc 

“Make a Mark and leave your impression online.”
sxswi2007 – official tag
“folksomy” “infocloud”

Flickr
9 million unique tags
No such thing as information architechgure. It’s like termites, structures built up and crumbled away over timeafdsasfd
• weather – big tag, lunar ecclipse
• events – the gates installation in NY
• news – paris riots
• learning – wildflowers tagging universal
• attraction – clusters form
• mimicry
• infection – doyourworst (funny faces) – yahoo research, world explorer tagging locations
• nerdy tagging – machine tagging geo lon/lat
Folksomy/Taxonomy machine tags in the overlap

Consumating (geek dating site) – comsumating.com
tags + standard dating portfolio
you tag you + other ppl tag you

show common tags between people, able to narrow matches between tags
releasing source soon

Vander Wal (tag research)

Social bookmarking – magnolia – beyond soc bookmarking sharing also chat/forum
public library tagging books by users
museum (steve.museum) tag collections different vocab
wine – cork’d
music – las.fm
travel – guardian, realtravel

Tag terms matter, tag structure matters – makes a difference
i.e. social.network social-network social_network socialnetwork

1,1,2,2 one person one tag 2 sites, design on delicious is different than design on magnolia

scaling # of ppl tagging x times tagged
A. personal use
B. serendipity (some usage)
C. powerful serach works and groups
D. mature system use for things

pivots and filters, most tags related tags subjects etc. (librarything)

RawSugar lets you narrow and chose tags
amazon tagging many item options, yes/no tag voting to refine your tagging

Tag Commons – trying to bring together

Questions
problem tags
no such thing as problem tags, just ppl who use them
want the buzz words and have tagging but what if you’re Kevin Federline?

Tagging Tags, RawSugar

Tagging into Corp Org
2 ppl lowest number to have tags effective.

Categories
Saturday

Getting to Consistency – don’t make your users think

Saturday, March 10th @ 11:30 am

Paul Schreiber   Screen Real Estate Agent,   Apple
Jennifer Fraser   Lead User Experience Designer,   Corel Corporation
Alex Graveley   Sr Engineer,   VMware Inc
Steve Johnson   Sr User Experience Mgr,   Adobe Systems Inc

What is consistency?
menu commands differnt names/commands for same thing
usps postal machine
voiting machines

consistency for consistency sake is bad – where in the workflow should this happen? (Adobe)
brand important – user by user & workflow by workflow
consistency is just a guideline – always a moving target because things are always changing

visual consistency sometimes and extra consistency between similar aps

Costs of inconsistency
expectation that things work the same way (focus, drag/drop, open, save, close)
Make users feel comfortable and create a brand.

Adobe lightroom, new design, but keep some of photoshop consistencies

difficult between different platforms

Adobe gets calls whenever they remove something – elements remove undo/redo buttons highest call volumes. It can hit the bottom line.
There needs to be a reason for the change – customer needs to know/see/feel that reason – the benefit of the change is immediately clear.

Goals
goals for company and goals for user
consistency greatly improves usability – pickup discoverability, at some point you must evolve
features not important – goals important
how to make a clean break to make a change (no floppy on macs) – it’s easier when there is a new product, you have freedom to rethinkg some of the old descisions
see what the customer is doing and make those breaks on what they need or what they are trying to do with current/old versions and look where things are migrating to in the first place

Achieving constency
create buffer between what you are doing and your source of inspiration – useing ipod control and it doesn’t perform exactly like ipod control throws off users
user needs, what is workflow of your user and what are their needs? workflows for everyone are different even doing the same things
find lowest common denominator between all users
focus on the target users for your app
Ask the user what they are almost always fails because you end up removing features and pigionhole the users w/labels – find a way to unveil features based on usage

Crossing platforms
How much to you make it like native platoform or like a competitor product on the same platform?
how it looks and how it works – pick up patterns that os already has and leverage those. stylistic differents, little visual cues make sure if feels like it is supposed to be on that platform
web is more difficult because there aren’t any base guidelines like w/an os – good/bad, easier to implement, but can be across the board

Accessibility (508)
Inconsistencies make it harder to be accessible, accessibility makes a good tool to bring consistency

Categories
Saturday

Emerging Social and Technology Trends

Saturday, March 10th @ 10:00 am

Laura Moorhead   Sr Editor Culture,   Wired
Andrew Blum   Contributing Editor,   Wired
Robert Fabricant   Exec Creative Dir,   Frog Design
Eliot Van Buskirk   Columnist/Blogger,   Wired News
Peter Rojas  Engadget
Daniel Raffel   Product Mgr,   Yahoo! 

Tech brings social change – everyday people effect/drive always being connected effect how we present ourselves in society

The speed that everything changes in tech is very quck. People understand their social position as it is reflected back in new tech mediums.

widgets splinter the internet as the internet splintered the world

placez.com

microtrend pepole have different send of privacy – young people put their whole lives online, older don’t. It’s up to us on how we use this info, or how companies collecting this information use it.

Possible direction – everybody can get a myspace acct maybe we’re moving towards more private invite-only networks similar to the old ftp accts before napster – you have to know someone in the real world to get access to the virtual world.

Will this come to a T? what will be the balance between private/social information? Depends on your age and how you grew up and what you have known for your life

Akai MPC firmware update

Mod/hacking these systems (web/hardware/software) is important to make them work better
sometimes businesses don’t let/want you to be able to do this when in the long run, they might make their product more valuable. Some are now focusing on the 2nd market or addons or products where they can constantly be added onto.

iPhone surprising/disappointing because of how closed it is. Surprising because of the movement towards more open apps/networks. Part of the problem is the networks (cell) are so locked down. Social trends won’t happen w/cell like they did w/computers because they are so locked down. The litmus test will be the cable card and if/how they take off.

What will influence social tech? baby boomers kids growing up having this tech from birth will determine direction.

other contries postal to email, email to postal – dev contries most likely to go the direction of underpowered last gen mobile devices and cell vs. high power computers

higher ed change to take on this issue? connect together more aspects of how students learn – games etc.

fugure of email? not going anywhere

Categories
General

legos at sxsw registration

Categories
General

SXSW

We’ve arrived in Austin!

Categories
Uncategorized

Blue Shirt IPA

Categories
Uncategorized

The perfect storm of sports

Categories
Uncategorized

The Olympics begin?

Categories
Uncategorized

Understanding Iran